Essay
A contractor used dynamite to loosen a rocky hillside.The blast from the dynamite caused a house foundation to crack.The house was located over a half-mile away from the dynamite site.The contractor was careful when using the dynamite,and no allegation of negligence is made.However,the house owner claims the contractor is liable for damage to the foundation.Is the house owner correct? Explain.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Yes.The contractor is liable under the c...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q17: If a court applies res ipsa loquitur<br>A)the
Q18: Most states recognize some form of comparative
Q19: Kenneth was exposed to radiation on his
Q20: Which of the following acts resulting in
Q21: For the defendant to be liable in
Q23: The test of "foreseeability" is generally used
Q24: While hunting,Roger enters Adele's property without permission
Q25: To establish res ipsa loquitur in most
Q26: Negligence concerns harm that<br>A)is unforeseeable.<br>B)arises intentionally.<br>C)arises by
Q27: As it applies to landowners,which of the