Multiple Choice
Cecilia made a check out to Gideon for $15.Gideon fraudulently changed the check to read $150,and cashed it at Corner Bank.Is Cecilia discharged from liability on the check?
A) Yes,Cecilia owes nothing on the check because alteration of a check is a real defense and real defenses are good even against holders in due course.
B) No,Cecilia pays $150 because of the impostor rule.
C) No,Cecilia pays $150 because she is not an indorser or accommodation party.
D) Yes,Cecilia owes nothing unless Corner Bank is a holder in due course,in which case she owes the original $15.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: James Packard,a lawyer representing Robert Marino,received a
Q17: If an employee with responsibility for issuing
Q18: Lana wrote a check knowing that she
Q19: Tom indorsed a check made payable to
Q20: Verne has possession of a draft that
Q22: An instrument ordering someone else to pay
Q23: What term is used to indicate the
Q24: Check kiting is defined as<br>A)indorsing a check
Q25: Alejandro signs on the back of an
Q26: Anyone who presents a check for payment