Judges Who Believe in Contextualism Argue

Multiple Choice

Judges who believe in contextualism argue:

A) That the Constitution is a living document that should be interpreted to meet the needs of society.
B) That the context of a crime should be excluded from a criminal trial so as to ensure uniformity.
C) That the intent of the framers of the documents should guide our decision making today.
D) That judicial restraint is always favored over judicial activism.