menu-iconExamlexExamLexServices

Discover

Ask a Question
  1. All Topics
  2. Topic
    Criminal Justice
  3. Study Set
    Criminal Procedure Study Set 3
  4. Exam
    Exam 8: Interrogations and Confessions
  5. Question
    In Miranda V
Solved

In Miranda V

Question 21

Question 21

Multiple Choice

In Miranda v.Arizona, the Court held that absent the three-part warning of rights, any police interrogation is "______."


A) unreasonable
B) unconstitutionally intimidating
C) inherently coercive
D) procedurally improper

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q16: Miranda v.Arizona established one of the few

Q17: The English Star Chamber is an example

Q18: Eighteenth-century English law held that confessions were

Q19: The Bram v.United States case held that

Q20: In which of the following cases did

Q22: The determination as to whether a confession

Q23: The government may intentionally elicit information.

Q24: If the police use the "question first

Q25: All of the following were identified as

Q26: All of the following were identified as

Examlex

ExamLex

About UsContact UsPerks CenterHomeschoolingTest Prep

Work With Us

Campus RepresentativeInfluencers

Links

FaqPricingChrome Extension

Download The App

Get App StoreGet Google Play

Policies

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines

Scan To Download

qr-code

Copyright © (2025) ExamLex LLC.

Privacy PolicyTerms Of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines