Multiple Choice
In Mapp v.Ohio, the U.S.Supreme Court held that ______.
A) evidence seized in an unlawful search was to be excluded in federal courts
B) evidence seized in an unlawful search was to be excluded in state courts
C) federal police who seized evidence in an unlawful manner were subject to criminal prosecutions
D) state police who seized evidence in an unlawful manner were subject to criminal prosecutions
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q61: In Weeks v.United States, the U.S.Supreme Court
Q62: Civilian review boards are only comprised of
Q63: Before the creation of the exclusionary rule,
Q64: What is the difference between the subjective
Q65: Which of the following alternative procedures requires
Q67: A weak connection between the unlawful search
Q68: In federal court, when entrapment is argued,
Q69: The _ provides that evidence that is
Q70: The _ doctrine is a method of
Q71: In Wolf v.Colorado, the U.S.Supreme Court _.<br>A)incorporated