True/False
In Katz v.U.S., the Court held that interceptions of communications were neither a Fourth Amendment search nor a Fourth Amendment seizure.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q32: To continue monitoring the calls of suspects
Q33: In Kyllo v.U.S., the Supreme Court held
Q34: Federal law allows secret taping of conversations
Q35: In Alabama v.White (1990), the Court held
Q36: Consent to search a computer permits officers
Q38: A warrant authorizing covert entry into a
Q39: No exception in federal law permits electronic
Q40: The law of electronic surveillance was modified
Q41: Most wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping federal statutes
Q42: The Fourth Amendment requires that assertions of