Multiple Choice
Berman made a documentary on the life of musician Artie Shaw.Shaw was cooperative and gave her permission to use certain songs if she received proper permissions from the copyright holders.The cost of the film was funded by her own savings,a private investor,the Canada Council,the Ontario Arts Council,and deferred salaries and material costs.In March of 1987 the film won an academy award as the best feature documentary for 1986.In November of 1987 Shaw's lawyer contacted Berman's lawyer: "...This letter states that Artie Shaw has a 35 percent profit participation in the motion picture ...." Which of the following accurately sets out the legal position of the parties?
A) Shaw has a right to this share because the movie is about him.
B) The court will imply an agreement to this effect between the parties.
C) Shaw has no claim since there was no such agreement.
D) A public celebrity has the right to prevent this kind of exploitation if Berman refuses this demand.
E) The court will award Shaw a reasonable profit because it is fair.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: The promise to make a charitable donation
Q51: For the postbox rule to apply, the
Q105: An ad in the morning paper read:
Q108: When the parties agree to pay the
Q110: Joe contracted with Sam,agreeing to pay Sam
Q112: An ad in the morning newspaper read
Q113: In Martel Building Ltd.v.Canada,what did the Supreme
Q116: What must be present in an offer
Q134: List the five ingredients necessary to form
Q174: Indicate the correct statement about consideration.<br>A) In