Multiple Choice
The case of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v.Milhomens examined the effect of one party's insanity on a contract.What did the Court find?
A) For a contract to be voidable because of insanity, one party must be insane and the other party must have known (or ought to have known) of the insanity.
B) If a person has the mental faculties to sign a contract, that person cannot be insane.
C) If a insane person enters into a contract, that contract is automatically void.
D) Contracts are not enforceable by either party if one party can establish a mental defect.
E) The relevant test for insanity is simply whether one party believed the other to be insane, at the moment the offer was made.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: From the perspective of contract law, why
Q31: Requirements of a contract include capacity of
Q66: Contracts that unduly restrict competition are void.
Q69: Which of the following is false with
Q95: Sue had a beautiful lakeside cottage that
Q99: Joe was unable to find work in
Q100: Discuss the Statute of Frauds as it
Q101: "Because of the Charter of Rights and
Q102: Assuming that all other elements of a
Q104: In his last year of high school,Larry,a