Multiple Choice
Mrs.Reid prepared her house for the market by contracting with Silversteps Ltd.to have her front steps replaced for the sum of $800.Warren,an employee of the company,worked for days framing the stairs and pouring the concrete.Unfortunately,he had done the framing wrong and,in addition,the concrete mix was faulty,so all of his efforts were in vain; the stairs were worthless.On these facts,which of the following is true?
A) Mrs. Reid could successfully sue only Silversteps Ltd. for breach of contract.
B) Mrs. Reid could successfully sue only Silversteps Ltd. for breach of contract or Warren for breach of contract but not both.
C) Mrs. Reid could successfully sue both Silversteps Ltd. and Warren for breach of contract because they were both connected with the job.
D) If Silversteps Ltd. failed to pay Warren under the employment contract, Warren could sue Mrs. Reid directly for his pay because he worked on her stairs.
E) Mrs. Reid could successfully sue the manufacturer of the cement for breach of contract because the cement was not fit for its purpose.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: Correction by the court of the wording
Q12: According to Braut v. Stec, what is
Q29: In Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club
Q36: Mr.Ho talked with Mr.Tarr,who ran a business
Q37: What is the effect of a court
Q38: Clive and Bill were not friends but
Q40: What is rectification?
Q42: In Works v.Works,what was the result where
Q45: Where the misrepresentation is innocent, explain the
Q79: Which of the following is false with