Essay
Greg sues Ned in an effort to obtain title to some land claimed by Ned and located inside the state of Texas.Ned has never been to Texas in his life,has never had any contacts of any kind with the state,and refuses to appear in Texas to defend against Greg's suit.Later,after Greg wins a default judgment against Ned,Ned shows up in Texas to claim that the judgment was invalid because he was totally outside Texas,hence Texas courts had no jurisdiction over him,and for this reason they could not affect his rights to the land.Is Ned right? Why or why not? Assume that subject-matter jurisdiction exists.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Ned is wrong.Although the utter absence ...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q57: Today,most appealable decisions from the lower courts
Q58: John lives and works in State A.While
Q59: For federal "diversity" jurisdiction to exist:<br>A)the case
Q60: Does the Federal Arbitration Act override a
Q61: A defendant who participates in a case
Q63: Minor criminal cases and civil disputes are
Q64: A method of alternative dispute resolution in
Q65: In which of the following cases will
Q66: The defendant must wait until after the
Q67: Patent cases being litigated in the federal