Multiple Choice
In the case in the text,Walters v.YMCA,what was the court's holding?
A) The language of the exculpatory clause was void and unenforceable as against public policy.
B) Then language of the exculpatory clause was overly broad and unenforceable as against public policy.
C) The language of the exculpatory clause was appropriate under the circumstances and Walters could not recover.
D) The language of the exculpatory clause was unenforceable because parties cannot free themselves of negligence liability.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: Courts tend to judge noncompetition clauses in
Q12: A(n)_ clause is a provision in a
Q13: Which of the following is not a
Q14: What is an exculpatory clause?
Q15: Which of the following is most true
Q17: An agreement to divorce one's spouse is
Q18: Which of the following is true regarding
Q19: Which of the following is an example
Q20: A contract to commit a serious crime
Q21: _ is generally taken to mean the