Multiple Choice
Sklar,an accountant,purchased two computers from Wiz Corp.Sklar discovered material defects in the computers 10 months after taking delivery.Three years after discovering the defects,Sklar commenced an action for breach of warranty against Wiz.Wiz raised the statute of limitations as a defense.The original contract between Wiz and Sklar contained a conspicuous clause providing that the statute of limitations for breach of warranty actions would be limited to 18 months.Under the circumstances,Sklar will:
A) win because the action was commenced within the four-year period as measured from the date of delivery.
B) win because the action was commenced within the four-year period as measured from the time he discovered the breach or should have discovered the breach.
C) lose because the clause providing that the statute of limitations would be limited to 18 months is enforceable.
D) lose because the statute of limitations is three years from the date of delivery with respect to written contracts.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q77: Which of the following allows a party
Q78: Which of the following promises is subject
Q79: When a person owes an unconditional duty
Q80: A party cannot recover for losses that
Q81: As demonstrated in the case in the
Q83: What is an injunction?<br>A)The awarding of compensatory
Q84: Which of the following compensate for reasonable
Q85: A(n)_ is a future,uncertain event that creates
Q86: Which of the following characterizes the statute
Q87: Which of the following occurs when the