In Mogilevsky V

Multiple Choice

In Mogilevsky v.Rubicon Technology,Inc. ,the case in the text,the court upheld the jury's verdict that:

A) Rubicon was liable for conversion.
B) Rubicon could not remove the system because it had become attached to the real estate.
C) Rubicon could not remove the system because its damage to the real estate would be vast.
D) the system in dispute was a removable trade fixture.