Multiple Choice
In the case in the text,In re Sia,the court held that:
A) the inclusion of the notice provision was burdensome and destroyed the negotiability of the note.
B) the challenged clauses were not additional undertakings,and the note was negotiable.
C) the inclusion of the conditional payment clause did not constitute a "fixed amount of money" and rendered the document nonnegotiable.
D) the challenged clauses were additional undertakings,and the clauses destroyed the negotiability of the note.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A conditional indorsement:<br>A)destroys the negotiability of the
Q2: Liz,the owner of a coffee shop in
Q3: A check payable "to cash" is an
Q4: Which of the following "signatures" would be
Q6: In Heritage Bank v.Bruha,the case in the
Q7: Selena Johnson has a checking account at
Q8: Payments made with a credit card and
Q9: Which section of the UCC covers how
Q10: The drafters of Revised Article 3 created
Q11: Jim Stanley writes a check on his