Multiple Choice
John received a check from his employer marked "pay to the order of John Jones." John used this check to pay for groceries from ABC Foods.He wrote on the back of the check: "pay to ABC Foods,for groceries." Was this check properly negotiated?
A) No,because the statement that the check was for payment to ABC Foods defeats this negotiation.
B) No,because John did not indorse the check.
C) Yes,because John transferred possession of the check and ABC Foods acted in good faith.
D) Yes,because a holder's signature is not always needed in order to negotiate a check.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q80: On June 1,Mike writes a check payable
Q81: In which of the following situations is
Q82: In the case in the text Lehigh
Q83: Under Revised Article 3,a person is a(n)_
Q84: Which of the following is an example
Q85: A holder in due course of a
Q86: UCC section 2-302(a)(1)states that in order for
Q88: In some circumstances, Revised Article 3 allows a
Q89: Generally,real defenses arise out of the transaction
Q90: Which of the following indorsements is a