Multiple Choice
In the case in the text New Randolph Halsted Currency Exchange v.Regent Title Insurance Company,what was the court's holding when it determined that New Randolph could qualify as a holder in due course?
A) It took the check without notice that any party had a claim in recoupment to it.
B) It acted in good faith.
C) It took the check for value.
D) It acted in a commercially reasonable manner in seeking to determine the authenticity of the check.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q62: Which of the following was the court's
Q63: Which of the following is not a
Q64: A person who makes an executory promise
Q65: Which of the following is NOT a
Q66: Which of the following was the court's
Q68: An instrument that is payable "to cash"
Q69: Sonia,through fraudulent representations,induced Gracie to execute a
Q70: The new Article 3 recognizes and enforces
Q71: What is the shelter rule in Article
Q72: In case in the text Bank of