Solved

In the Case in the Text,Forcht Bank V

Question 74

Multiple Choice

In the case in the text,Forcht Bank v.Gribbins,what did the court hold?


A) Gribbins was careless in having a relationship with Akers and therefore,the court applied a comparative fault analysis.
B) Gribbins did not safeguard her checks and therefore,could not claim forgery.
C) The bank failed its duty to exercise ordinary care because it knew the checks were forged.
D) The bank failed its duty to exercise ordinary care when it honored eight forged checks.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions