Multiple Choice
In Urbain v.Beierling,the case in the text,why did the court hold that the defendants did not breach the partnership agreement when they dissolved the partnership?
A) The partnership agreement did not set forth a specific term.
B) The partnership agreement only required a majority vote.
C) The RUPA only required a majority vote.
D) The RUPA allows the parties to take such action when a dispute arises.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q79: Which of the following is true about
Q80: Hagus was a partner at Ace-Star General
Q81: Amos,Beverly,Carlos,and Dan were partners in a partnership
Q82: Dissociation is the term for adding new
Q83: Which of the following is true about
Q85: Which of the following causes dissociation?<br>A)A partner's
Q86: Anthony,a partner of a partnership firm,was convicted
Q87: Mark is a partner in Harbin Associates,a
Q88: Which of the following is true about
Q89: If a partner of an LLP is