In the Case in the Text,United States V

Multiple Choice

In the case in the text,United States v.Hsiung,the court held that:

A) the price-fixing scheme as alleged and proven was subject to per se analysis under the Sherman Act.
B) a per se analysis was inappropriate because the conduct in question occurred in another country.
C) the $500 million fine imposed was improper because it was based on the collective gains to all members of the conspiracy rather than the gains to AUO alone.
D) the jury instruction misled the jury as to its task.