Solved

In the Case in the Text,United States V

Question 24

Multiple Choice

In the case in the text,United States v.Ohio Edison Company,why did the court hold that the updates on the utility's equipment were subject to preconstruction review?


A) The projects were intended to increase hours of operation.
B) Even though the projects consisted of routine maintenance,there would be a substantial increase in emissions.
C) The projects cost $136.4 million.
D) The projects were not routine and they would result in a substantial increase in emissions.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions