Multiple Choice
Mr. Holden, a program developer, developed software for inventory control that was superior to others on the market. He launched an ad campaign and all went well for several months-until a competitor came out with a cheaper program. In time, he could not pay his debts when they became due and owing. A supplier sued for damages and was awarded judgment for $21,000. Holden did not pay. With regard to the supplier's position at this time, which of the following is false?
A) Since the decision is in his favour, the supplier would be a judgment creditor, Holden, a judgment debtor.
B) The supplier could have a garnishee order served on Holden's bank, ordering the bank to pay money into court instead of to Holden.
C) The supplier could examine Holden under oath about his assets and sources of income.
D) The supplier could obtain a writ of execution that directs a court official to seize Holden and detain him in court until he arranges payment.
E) The supplier could get a government-authorized official to seize and sell enough of Holden's property to satisfy the debt.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: Serious disadvantages of alternate dispute resolution are
Q15: Some businesses may be subject to both
Q16: Generally, when a cause of action arises
Q17: Who are the parties in a civil
Q18: When one person is suing another in
Q20: In Baker v. Canada, the Supreme Court
Q21: A case in which a businessperson is
Q22: How many judges usually sit on the
Q23: Which of the following is an advantage
Q24: Distinguish between a criminal and civil trial.