Multiple Choice
Allen hired Beth to do a marketing survey. The contract provided that she would start the work on January 15 and finish it by March 15, the date for completion being a condition on the contract. She would be paid $2000. After one month of work, when the work was half completed, Beth assigned the $2000 contract price to Charlie, from whom she had bought computer hardware. Charlie gave written notice of the assignment to Allen on the same day. The second month's work went badly. Information entered into the computer was lost and Beth could not finish on time. She was five days late, and each day cost Allen $100. His total foreseeable loss was $500 because of her breach. On these facts, which of the following is true?
A) Charlie could receive only $1000 from Allen because half of the $2000 project was finished when he gave notice of the assignment to Allen.
B) Charlie could receive $2000 from Allen because that is the amount owed to Charlie and the amount assigned by Beth.
C) Charlie could receive $1500, because when the contract was completed, that was all that was legally owed to Beth.
D) Charlie could receive only $1000 from Allen because only half the work was done when the assignment was made.
E) Charlie gets $0 from Allen because one can assign contractual obligations but not contractual rights.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Discuss the signs that the doctrine of
Q6: The principle that courts will not permit
Q7: Correction by the court of the wording
Q8: Damages are available as a remedy where
Q9: The purpose of contract law is to
Q11: A windfall that one party to a
Q12: Explain what is meant by a "constructive
Q13: Where one person transfers his rights to
Q14: In AMJ Campbell v. Kord Products Inc.,
Q15: A victim of fraud cannot seek damages