Multiple Choice
Would a letter written after the execution of a contract and which contained agreements different from those in the written contract be admissible under the parol evidence rule?
A) No, because it contradicts the terms of the contract.
B) No, because it changes the agreement.
C) No, because it explains the agreement.
D) Yes, it would be admissible, because it is subsequent to the written agreement.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q34: In order to be sufficient, an agreement
Q41: In order to induce a car dealer
Q71: The 2001 Revisions to Article 1, adopted
Q72: A significant impediment to e-commerce has been
Q74: The UCC statute of frauds requires that
Q75: a. What are the basic requirements of
Q78: Which of the following promises in consideration
Q79: April, executrix of Hobbes' estate, promised Mr.
Q80: The UCC requires that all contracts for
Q81: Which of the following is true regarding