Multiple Choice
On April 1,2005 Parker entered an oral contract with Wilkins in which Parker promised to work for Wilkins for three years for a salary of $40,000 per year.On April 5,2005,Wilkins called Parker and repudiated the contract,stating that he had decided not to hire him after all.If Parker sues Wilkins for breach of contract:
A) Wilkins will win because the contract violates the statute of frauds.
B) Wilkins will lose because the contract is enforceable.
C) Wilkins will win because the contract violates the parol evidence rule.
D) Wilkins will lose because his main purpose in promising to hire Parker was to benefit himself.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: Explain with an example how the parol
Q12: For the requirement that certain types of
Q13: Harold makes an oral agreement to purchase
Q14: "Parol evidence" refers to:<br>A)the evidence given at
Q15: Explain the writing requirement under the UCC
Q18: Oral evidence may be introduced to "fill
Q19: When a contract is partly printed and
Q20: Oral evidence may be introduced to help
Q21: The equitable doctrine of _ allows some
Q22: Under the U.N.Convention on the International Sale