Multiple Choice
Which of the following explains why a compensation contract designed to combat employee moral hazard that features strong incentives might be worse than having no incentive scheme at all?
A) If performance depends on factors other than just the employee's effort, the strong incentives create large costs associated with risk bearing.
B) Employers are generally pretty skilled at measuring the aspects of job performance in which they are the most interested.
C) Generally, an employee's effort and ability are the only two determinants of the employee's performance.
D) This is a trick question; in the presence of moral hazard, even a poorly-designed incentive scheme is better than no incentive scheme.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q35: In Figure 21.1: <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB1640/.jpg" alt="In Figure
Q36: Figure 21.1 shows a set of: <img
Q37: Adverse selection can cause attractive trading partners
Q38: Which of the following is NOT a
Q39: Screening mechanisms are designed to _ the
Q41: The problem of adverse selection was first
Q42: A salesperson works for a car dealership
Q43: Explain in your own words how the
Q44: Screening is a process that is employed
Q45: The requirement by some life insurance companies