Solved

Which of the Following Explains Why a Compensation Contract Designed

Question 40

Multiple Choice

Which of the following explains why a compensation contract designed to combat employee moral hazard that features strong incentives might be worse than having no incentive scheme at all?


A) If performance depends on factors other than just the employee's effort, the strong incentives create large costs associated with risk bearing.
B) Employers are generally pretty skilled at measuring the aspects of job performance in which they are the most interested.
C) Generally, an employee's effort and ability are the only two determinants of the employee's performance.
D) This is a trick question; in the presence of moral hazard, even a poorly-designed incentive scheme is better than no incentive scheme.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions