Multiple Choice
A manufacturer might try to defend itself against charges of illegal price discrimination by claiming that:
A) the price discrimination occurred as a defensive measure to "meet competition in good faith."
B) the price differentials did not actually injure competition.
C) the price differentials were justified on the basis of cost differences in production and/or distribution.
D) its products were not of "like grade and quality."
E) Any of these could make price discrimination legal.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q50: A marketing manager might offer a cash
Q51: Basic list prices are the prices that
Q52: Price discrimination is illegal according to the
Q53: Some nonprofit organizations set prices to increase
Q54: When individual firms set their own prices-sometimes
Q56: Pricing objectives need not be explicitly stated.
Q57: Status quo pricing objectives might focus on
Q58: Nonprice competition, a status quo pricing objective,
Q59: When setting a price level policy, a
Q60: When a firm sells through intermediaries, there