Multiple Choice
Assume Pollutex Inc.produces paper in its plant located on Lake Ontario,half a mile away from CleanAir Camping.Pollutex employs an obsolete production process,dumping pollutants in the lake.The camp has experienced a steady decline in the number of attendees since Pollutex moved nearby.In particular,the owners forecast that CleanAir Camping will generate a profit of only $50,000 a year in the future,which is $150,000 less than the one generated before Pollutex moved nearby.A cleaner production process is available,which would not require dumping the pollutants in the lake.However,converting the plant would increase yearly costs by $100,000.Is the current situation Pareto efficient?
A) Yes,since there is no alternative that would make CleanAir better off without hurting Pollutex,and vice versa.
B) No,as Pollutex could convert its plant and make CleanAir better off by $200,000.
C) No.In fact,CleanAir owners could pay Pollutex a sum between $100,000 and $150,000 a year to convert its plant and increase profits between $0 and $50,000.
D) No.In fact,Pollutex owners could pay CleanAir a sum between $0 and $150,000 to move to a different location.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: Assume the government introduces a $0.50 per
Q28: Faith and Hope are 30-year-old identical twins.The
Q29: Assume the market for hammers is perfectly
Q30: The production and distribution of goods and
Q31: What are the goals of an economic
Q33: Currently XYZ's compensation system is such that
Q34: A competitive equilibrium price guarantees that<br>A)consumers who
Q35: According to Ronald Coase,for a free-market economy
Q36: Assume the current market price of candles
Q37: According to Ronald Coase,allocation of resources in