Which of the Following Was the Result in Hartford Underwriters

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result in Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company v.The Cincinnati Insurance Company,the case in the text involving whether insurance coverage was available to a party injured when a vehicle hit her while she was loading a van and the policy at issue provided coverage for a person "occupying" a vehicle defined as "in,upon,getting in,on,out or off"?

A) That a jury question was presented as to the meaning of the policy language.
B) That any ambiguity in the language was resolved against the insurer writing the policy, that a reasonable reading of the policy included the claim, and that coverage was therefore available.
C) That any ambiguity in the language was resolved against the claimant, that a reasonable reading of the policy indicated that incidents of the type involved were excluded, and that coverage was therefore unavailable.
D) That the language was not ambiguous and that it clearly provided coverage.
E) That the language was not ambiguous and that it clearly excluded coverage.