Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in Cameron v.Ewing,the case in the text involving whether monthly proceeds from a reverse mortgage were subject to garnishment?
A) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because the payments did not constitute earned income.
B) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because the defendant's estate was ultimately liable to repay the monies received to the extent repayment could be generated from sale of the property.
C) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because it would be against public policy to find as such.
D) The court ruled that the payments were subject to garnishment because the payments constituted debts due the defendant.
E) The court ruled that the payments were subject to garnishment based on public policy and also that the claimant was entitled to the full amount of the monthly payments.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: A suretyship and a guaranty are the
Q15: An artisan's lien remains in effect regardless
Q16: Which of the following is the term
Q17: Attachment is the same thing as a
Q18: What is the amount of the homestead
Q21: A composition agreement is a contract between
Q22: Both artisan's and mechanic's liens are super-priority
Q23: Assuming the court follows the reasoning of
Q24: Which of the following is a judicial
Q84: Which of the following is true if