Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in Lucy

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result on appeal in Lucy Mydlach v.DaimlerChrysler Corp.,the case in the text involving whether the plaintiff could bring a revocation of acceptance claim against a vehicle manufacturer and the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act?

A) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
B) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not made as they should have been made.
C) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
D) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not made as they should have been made.
E) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the manufacturer was notified that a problem with the vehicle existed.