Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in Welchert v.American Cyanamid Inc.,the case in the text in which the plaintiffs claimed breach of an express warranty after herbicide manufactured by the defendant allegedly caused crop damage,and the issue was whether the Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act preempted claims involving the product's label?
A) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted by FIFRA.
B) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was not preempted by FIFRA.
C) The court ruled that the portion of the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only to the extent that it sought money damages as opposed to equitable relief.
D) The court ruled that the portion of the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only to the extent that it sought equitable relief as opposed to money damages.
E) The court ruled that the state law claim for breach of express warranty was preempted only because it was not filed in a timely manner.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q56: Set forth when an implied warranty of
Q57: Assurances by one party that the other
Q58: Which of the following options have most
Q60: The UCC adopted the common law of
Q61: To use common law language a[n] _
Q62: Which of the following is false regarding
Q63: Prudence purchased a new printer for her
Q65: A[n] _ is any description of the
Q76: When was the Magnuson-Moss Act passed?<br>A) 1950<br>B)
Q78: What is the warranty of assignability at