Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in the case of Webster v.Blue Ship Tea Room Inc.,the case in which the plaintiff sued after getting a bone caught in her throat while eating fish chowder?
A) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of merchantability.
B) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
C) That the plaintiff could recover based on an express warranty.
D) That the plaintiff could recover based on either breach of an express warranty or breach of the implied warranty of merchantability.
E) That the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not a foreign substance to the fish and should have been expected.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: Which of the following is true regarding
Q42: In order to disclaim the implied warranty
Q44: Which of the following is required by
Q45: Which of the following are types of
Q48: What was the result in the "Case
Q48: Which of the following is true regarding
Q49: Assuming adoption of the UCC, which of
Q50: Which is true regarding a buyer's right
Q51: Molly goes to the store and buys
Q75: Express warranties may be found in advertisements.