Multiple Choice
Which of the following is true regarding Roland's claim that Selina had no right to withhold his furniture?
A) Roland is correct. Selina was required to deliver the furniture, but she retained the right to sue him for any deficiency.
B) Roland is correct but only because of the special UCC exception for consumer goods.
C) Roland is incorrect. Selina had a right to withhold the furniture.
D) Roland is incorrect but only if Selina can prove that she had no reason to believe that he was a credit risk prior to signing the contract of sale.
E) Roland is correct because of federal consumer protection laws.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: Which of the following are damages identified
Q46: If a buyer accepts nonconforming goods,the buyer
Q47: Which of the following is the preferred
Q48: Which of the following is true of
Q49: Which of the following was the result
Q51: The case of Hill v.Gateway,discussed in the
Q52: Under which of the following circumstances will
Q53: Is Trudy likely correct in that she
Q54: Which of the following provide remedies to
Q55: Which of the following is true regarding