Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in Forest

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result on appeal in Forest Commodity Corp.("FCC") v.Lone Star Industries Inc.,the case in the text in which the Forest Commodity Corp.denied that it violated a contractual nonassignability clause and claimed that it was entitled to recover on a breach of contract claim because the defendant did not fully perform?

A) The court ruled that FCC did not violate a nonassignability clause and that it was entitled to recover.
B) The court ruled that even though FCC violated the nonassignability clause, the nonassignability clause was against public policy; and FCC was allowed to recover.
C) The court ruled that even though FCC violated the nonassignability clause, the other party also violated a nonassignability clause resulting in FCC being able to recover its full claim.
D) The court ruled that FCC violated a nonassignability clause and was therefore unable to recover on its claim.
E) The court ruled that FCC violated a nonassignability clause but that because the other party also violated a nonassignability clause, FCC's recovery would be reduced by 50%, not completely barred.