Multiple Choice
What was the result in the case in the text Lucy v.Zehmer involving whether allegations of joking prevented the formation of the contract involved?
A) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because one of the parties was subjectively joking.
B) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because one of the parties was joking, and a reasonable person should have known that.
C) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because the parties had been drinking although they were not intoxicated.
D) The court ruled that the agreement would be enforced because under the applicable standard, it was not apparent that joking was involved.
E) The court ruled that the contract would be enforced because of what the parties verbally said regardless of whether an objective person would have thought joking was involved.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following was the result
Q39: List the ways in which an offer
Q56: Which of the following provides that an
Q57: Inez,wishing to sell a used business law
Q58: Which of the following is correct regarding
Q59: An "instructed authorization" occurs if the means
Q60: What is the likely result in the
Q61: An offer by a retailer to purchase
Q62: Trudy signs a contract with ABC Book
Q65: Once an offer is made,an offeror has