Multiple Choice
What was the result in the case discussed in the text Andrus v.State Department of Transportation,and City of Olympia in which the plaintiff sued because a job offer was allegedly revoked?
A) The plaintiff won because the city had validly offered him a job and had no right to revoke it.
B) The plaintiff won because, while there was no contract, the court ruled that the city was not allowed to mislead him on equitable grounds and also on grounds of unlawful discrimination.
C) The defendant won because it had truly received a bad reference.
D) The defendant won because the plaintiff had not specifically accepted the job.
E) The defendant won because the purported job offer contained insufficient information to be considered reasonably certain in regard to its terms.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q24: If an offeree makes a mistake and
Q32: Which of the following terms would be
Q44: Constance asks Kathy if Kathy would consider
Q46: What have most states done with regard
Q48: Which of the following was the result
Q49: If the subject matter of an offer
Q50: Which of the following is presumed to
Q66: Which of the following is true regarding
Q73: Which of the following is true regarding
Q84: Explain the effect of auctions held with