Multiple Choice
What was the ruling of the court in the case of Welge v.Planters Lifesavers Co.,the case in which the plaintiff injured his hand when a jar containing peanuts broke?
A) That the case would be dismissed because the plaintiff could not establish that the jar was maintained in a pristine condition after its purchase.
B) That the plaintiff was unable to recover because negligence in manufacture of the jar could not be established.
C) That the plaintiff was unable to recover because he was not the actual purchaser of the jar of peanuts.
D) That the plaintiff would be allowed to proceed because negligence was established.
E) That the plaintiff would be allowed to proceed with the lawsuit because of a lack of evidence that the jar had been damaged after its purchase.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: As recognized by the court in Sperry-New
Q25: As of the date of text publication,what
Q26: Which of the following is true regarding
Q27: When all products of a particular design
Q28: What type of warranty,if any,did the salesperson
Q29: Which of the following may be sued
Q31: Which of the following is a reference
Q34: Which of the following was the result
Q35: The lack of a feasible way to
Q75: The state-of-the-art defense is not available in