Multiple Choice
What was the result at the Supreme Court level in Wyeth v.Levine,the case in the text in which the defending drug company took the position that the plaintiff's jury verdict on her state law claim alleging that the defendant improperly labeled a drug was preempted by federal law and should be overturned?
A) That the case should be dismissed because the defendant could not be subjected to both federal and state law.
B) That the case should be dismissed because it was impossible for the defendant to comply with both state and federal law.
C) That the case should be dismissed because complying with state law would obstruct the purposes and objectives of federal drug labeling regulation.
D) That the jury verdict would be upheld because the defendant could have complied with its state and federal law obligations.
E) That the jury verdict would be upheld because Wyeth failed to submit evidence that the plaintiff was guilty of comparative negligence.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: No duty to warn exists for dangers
Q25: Define and describe the three commonly used
Q36: As recognized by the court in Sperry-New
Q39: Under a strict product liability theory,who may
Q40: Which of the following is set out
Q43: Bob is a trained exterminator who received
Q45: Which of the following is true regarding
Q46: Which test for determining design defect is
Q47: Which of the following was true prior
Q49: Section 402A of the Restatement (Second)of Torts