Multiple Choice
Which of the following is true regarding a lawsuit brought by Alice's parents against the manufacturer for negligence?
A) Because neither Alice nor her parents were in privity of contract with the seller, no one other than Rambo's mother may be sued for negligence.
B) Privity of contract is not necessary in order to sue for negligence so the fact that neither Alice nor her parents were in privity of contract with the seller would not prevent a negligence based action.
C) Although privity of contract is not an issue, Alice's parents would be unable to prevail in a negligence action because Alice did not sustain permanent physical injury.
D) Although privity of contract is not an issue, Alice's parents would be unable to prevail in an action against the manufacturer for negligence because they did not read the instruction booklet.
E) Alice's parents would be prohibited from suing the manufacturer because of the federal law prohibiting lawsuits for failure to warn in cases involving children.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: Define and describe the three commonly used
Q47: Which of the following was true prior
Q49: Section 402A of the Restatement (Second)of Torts
Q50: Which of the following must a plaintiff
Q51: In order to proceed in a products
Q53: Which of the following are considered foreseeable
Q54: A bystander may not invoke the doctrine
Q57: In most states,what must a plaintiff prove
Q57: Describe the two approaches taken by courts
Q65: Following the case of MacPherson v. Buick