Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in Family Winemakers of California v.Jenkins,the case brought by winemakers from California challenging a Massachusetts law distinguishing between how large and small winemakers could distribute their wines in Massachusetts?
A) That the law impermissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers in violation of the Commerce Clause.
B) That the law permissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers and did not violate the commerce clause.
C) That the law impermissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers in violation of the Twenty-first Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
D) That the law impermissibly discriminated against out-of-state winemakers in violation of the Webb-Kenyon Acts.
E) That the law did not discriminate against out-of-state winemakers and that, therefore, no violation occurred.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: Which amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment?<br>A)
Q8: Which of the following is true regarding
Q9: If a law prevents individuals from exercising
Q10: Federal laws include laws passed by federal
Q11: Which clause provides that the Constitution,laws,and treaties
Q15: The fourteenth amendment is part of the
Q16: As expressed in the text,which of the
Q17: Which of the following is true regarding
Q29: What does the free-exercise clause of the
Q62: Which of the following is true regarding