Multiple Choice
Corine engaged Datz as her agent.It was mutually agreed that Datz would not disclose that he was acting as Corine's agent.Instead he was to deal with prospective customers as if he were a principal acting on his own behalf.In this way he made several contracts for Corine.If a third party were to file a lawsuit on one of the contracts,which of the following statements would be true?
A) Corine is disallowed from ratifying Datz's contracts in order to transfer liability.
B) Datz has no liability once he discloses that Corine is the real principal.
C) The third party can hold only Datz liable since the third party believed that Datz was the principal.
D) The third party may choose to hold either Datz or Corine liable.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: Sandra hired Jeff to work as a
Q24: As a general rule,a principal is not
Q33: A(n)_ case involves harm caused by the
Q44: The principal's ratification of a contract can
Q45: A principal is _ if a third
Q48: Why is it impossible for there to
Q50: A principal is liable for the misrepresentations
Q55: Implied ratification arises when:<br>A)the principal's conduct justifies
Q60: If an agent has,within the scope of
Q73: A principal is liable on a contract