Multiple Choice
What was the result in the Lefkowitz v.Great Minneapolis Surplus Store Inc.case (referenced in the textbook) involving an advertisement for the sale of fur coats?
A) The court ruled that the advertisement was not an offer because it involved a luxury good.
B) The court ruled that the advertisement was an offer but that the customer who was suing had not properly accepted it.
C) The court ruled that the advertisement was not an offer because it was a ridiculously low offer that the plaintiff should have known was not to be taken seriously.
D) The court ruled that the advertisement was not an offer because advertisements are never offers; instead,they are merely invitations for customers to make an offer.
E) The court ruled that the advertisement was an offer and that the plaintiff properly accepted it.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q94: Inez,wishing to sell a used business law
Q95: Refusal to Pay.Business law professor Debby needed
Q96: All contracts can be categorized as either
Q97: When a bilateral contract is being formed
Q98: Which of the following provides that an
Q100: _ contracts have all of their terms
Q101: Which of the following modifies the mirror-image
Q102: A bilateral contract is commonly defined as
Q103: The _ terms of an offer and
Q104: Which of the following refers to the