In Custom Vehicles V

Multiple Choice

In Custom Vehicles v. Forest River, Custom sued because Forest used the term "Work and Play" to describe a van it manufactured after Custom had registered the mark "Work-N-Play" to describe a vehicle it had built. The court found no trademark infringement because Work-N-Play:

A) had not acquired a secondary meaning to qualify as a suggestive trademark.
B) was not distinctive enough to qualify as a fanciful trademark.
C) was not distinctive enough to qualify as an arbitrary trademark.
D) had not acquired a secondary meaning to qualify as a descriptive trademark.