In Hauter V

Multiple Choice

In Hauter v. Zogarts, Hauter received, as a present, a "Golfing Gizmo" that was made by Zogarts. The device consisted of a golf ball attached to string that returned the ball to the user after it had been hit with a club. The box that it came in stated, "completely safe, ball will not hit player." Hauter had read the safety manual and used the product a dozen times, but then he hit the ball too low and it struck him in the head, causing serious injury. Hauter sued for:

A) breach of implied warranty only.
B) breach of express warranty only.
C) breach of express and implied warranty.
D) false advertising.