In Alston V

Multiple Choice

In Alston v. Advance Brands and Importing Company, Alston sued to prevent advertising of alcohol because it influenced children. He was found not to have standing for each of the reasons below except:

A) Alston did not evidence any actual injury.
B) Alston's children bought liquor using money provided by Alston, so he was at fault.
C) Alston could not show that a proper remedy was available.
D) Even if injury could be shown, the injury was not direct because Alston's alleged injury was not directly connected to the defendants and was broken by third-party sellers who criminally sold to minors.