Multiple Choice
For the same bivariate table,Cramer's V is .27 and lambda is zero.What can we conclude?
A) A computational mistake has been made.V can never be greater than lambdA.
B) This is a negative relationship.
C) There is no association;disregard V.
D) The variables may be associated even if lambda is zero.Disregard lambda if the row marginals are very unequal.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: Phi and Cramer's V would be appropriate
Q13: In tables larger than 2x2,the upper limit
Q14: According to the logic of proportional reduction
Q15: In a 2x2 table,phi ranges in
Q16: The strength of an association between variables
Q18: Cramer's V differs from phi in that
Q20: TABLE 13.1<br> <span class="ql-formula" data-value="\begin{array}{l|l|l|l|}\hline &\text
Q22: As measures of association,phi and Cramer's V
Q30: Lambda is asymmetric, which means that_.<br>A) the
Q31: For a 3 x 3 table, the