Multiple Choice
Why is it a good strategy for a microbe to adhere to a receptor that plays a critical function for a host cell?
A) It ISN'T a good strategy-host cells could shift to a backup receptor and shut down production of the main receptor, preventing infection.
B) If it's a receptor the cell MUST use, it doesn't have a backup system in place to switch to-so, even though it makes it susceptible to infection, it HAS to put that target out there. This benefits the microbe.
C) Microbes want to evade detection and elimination by the immune system-the closer they can adhere to host cells, the less likely they are to trigger destructive immune responses. This would be similar to using a hostage as a shield in a police-standoff situation.
D) It ISN'T a good strategy-by binding to receptors, microbes will be phagocytosed by cells and destroyed within them.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: The "hygiene hypothesis" proposes that<br>A)lack of exposure
Q9: Bacteria may survive phagocytosis by<br>A)preventing fusion of
Q13: High concentrations of some bacteria are necessary
Q35: A relationship in which one partner benefits
Q42: The microorganisms that are regularly found in
Q44: If a disease affects only a human
Q45: A more modern equivalent to Koch's Postulates
Q46: Avirulent organisms are<br>A) more likely to cause
Q71: The most successful parasites are the ones
Q86: Infection always leads to disease.