In the Brown Shoe Case, Which Involved a Merger, the Supreme

Multiple Choice

In the Brown Shoe case, which involved a merger, the Supreme Court:

A) allowed the merger, even though it felt the resulting firm would be able to undersell its competitors.
B) allowed the merger, because lower shoe prices would have benefited consumers.
C) chose to protect competition and blocked the merger.
D) refused to hear the case and threw it out without issuing any judgment in the matter.