Essay
Suppose there are 3 voters in a legislature, and two projects are up for consideration.Project A creates benefits of 3 for district 1 but benefit of -1 in district 2 and -3 in district 3.Project B creates benefits of 3 in district 2, -1 in district 1 and -3 in district 3.
a.Would either of these projects be implemented under simple majority rule voting (where each project is approved or not approved on its own)?
b.How would your answer to (a) change if the projects can be bundled?
c.Is it efficient to fund these projects?
d.Suppose the Coase Theorem applies to legislatures -- i.e.suppose legislators can create alternatives with cash side-payments.What might voter 3 do to prevent the outcome in (b)?
e.True or False: If transactions costs are low and side-payments are allowed, only efficient projects will pass under vote trading.
Correct Answer:

Verified
a. No -- each would only get one vote.
b...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
b...
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q1: The Pareto Unanimity axiom in Arrow's theorem
Q2: A democratic (majority rule) decision over a
Q3: Consider voter preferences over a public good
Q5: Voting in large elections is irrational unless
Q6: The "Anything-Can-Happen" theorem doesn't really imply "anything
Q7: Median voters in settings where the policy
Q8: Vote trading in legislatures can lead to
Q9: In settings where the policy space is
Q10: Arrow suggests that any social choice process
Q11: In 2000, three candidates appeared on virtually