Essay
At a large university, a group of education specialists tested the effectiveness of a new academic improvement course. Students seeking help at the university counseling center because of academic difficulties were asked to participate in this 4-week program. Only students who were judged to be deficient in reading comprehension and other study-related skills were chosen for the program. Students who sought help at the counseling center for emotional difficulties were included in the study as a comparison group. They received the usual treatment offered at the counseling center. A group of 30 students completed the academic-improvement program at the counseling center. Average test grades from the students' courses for the two groups were compared before (midterm exams) and after (final exams) the program. Analyses revealed that a statistically significant majority of the students were doing better in school after completing the academic-improvement program than before.
-What major threats to internal validity are controlled by this research design?
Correct Answer:

Verified
The use of a nonequivalent control group...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q15: Distinguish between evaluation of outcome and evaluation
Q29: A researcher was interested in determining whether
Q30: ,the most significant change needed if our
Q32: Research done in natural settings,as compared to
Q33: A human services agency was interested in
Q35: The external validity of research done in
Q36: Random assignment to conditions is used in
Q37: One threat to the internal validity of
Q38: The hallmark of a quasi-experiment is<br>A)high levels
Q39: A high school teacher conducted a test